Page 1 of 1

Elegance Bicycle® Playing Cards Deck on KS

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 2:43 pm
by badpete69


Image

Image

Image

Re: Elegance Bicycle® Playing Cards Deck on KS

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 4:32 pm
by vasta41
I don't quite get how the pips exude elegance...

Re: Elegance Bicycle® Playing Cards Deck on KS

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 5:11 pm
by vedus
Strange Wavy Lines Disconnected From The Back doesn't fit on the front of the tuck as well.

Re: Elegance Bicycle® Playing Cards Deck on KS

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 5:55 pm
by Bradius
I agree with you Vedus. The box tuck spade does not match the Ace of Spades at all. Also, the Ace of Spades looks confusingly similar to the Ace of Clubs. I would have a hard time distingushing them at a glance.

Re: Elegance Bicycle® Playing Cards Deck on KS

Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 5:22 am
by flashcards

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Re: Elegance Bicycle® Playing Cards Deck on KS

Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 9:54 am
by vedus
Hey. Now with four times the nope.

Re: Elegance Bicycle® Playing Cards Deck on KS

Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 9:59 am
by jerichoholic
Pure desperation to fund. People didn't want the 1 deck and still didn't want it when he added a second deck. So now he's added 2 more and reduced the goal. How does that even make financial sense anyway? Definite pass.

Re: Elegance Bicycle® Playing Cards Deck on KS

Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 10:48 am
by Azazaaz
I agree with all of the above.
To me, It looks like an offspring of an 8-Bit deck. Elegance does not come to mind when I think about 7 years old me having milk with cereals while playing Battletoads in front of the TV with a controller that only had a 1 meter long cable.

Re: Elegance Bicycle® Playing Cards Deck on KS

Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 11:54 am
by pstaehlin
Sorry but to me there is nothing "elegant" about this deck.

Re: Elegance Bicycle® Playing Cards Deck on KS

Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:26 pm
by theCapraAegagrus
pstaehlin wrote:Sorry but to me there is nothing "elegant" about this deck.
Sorry, not sorry, you're 100% correct.