{MOVED}
Anyhow, I think this really brings up the concept of creating user defined values. There could be say 2 check boxes and 2 numeric values within an individuals collection and then a related 4 field names that can be customized (rhu would just call user value 1-4 and user labels 1-4). You could specify that your 2 numeric values are 'Open' and 'Sealed' and then update those values within your collection. Meanwhile, I might call those same values 'On Loan' and 'Lost', others might use them for 'purchased price', 'year purchased', etc. The check boxes could also then be used for purposes like 'Favorites', 'Consider Selling', 'Transformation Deck', 'Uncut', etc. Implementing some simple sorts and groupings within an individual's collection could create any number of possible features without forcing it on everyone else or making it a 1,000 field nightmare to work through.
I think 3-5 custom fields for each check boxes and numeric might be a better goal though. We already have a description field so I don't think any custom sub labels (text boxes) would be needed here.
User defined values
Moderator: Playing Card DB Mod
- ecNate
- Member
- Posts: 2099
- Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2014 1:46 am
- Collector: Yes
- Player: Yes
- Decks Owned: 400
- Location: Wisconsin
- Has thanked: 420 times
- Been thanked: 440 times
- Contact:
User defined values
My card collection ('in hand' only) on Portfolio52 (the playing card database)
My wishlist, contact me if you have one to sell, let's chat! (My marketplace review thread)
My card collection thread here at UC
♠️ ♦️ My currently featured deck from my collection at Portfolio 52: Vanity Fair No 41 ♥️ ♣️
As a UC member you are encouraged to contribute/join Portfolio52, the greatest card collection site (FacebookPage)!
My wishlist, contact me if you have one to sell, let's chat! (My marketplace review thread)
My card collection thread here at UC
♠️ ♦️ My currently featured deck from my collection at Portfolio 52: Vanity Fair No 41 ♥️ ♣️
As a UC member you are encouraged to contribute/join Portfolio52, the greatest card collection site (FacebookPage)!
- ecNate
- Member
- Posts: 2099
- Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2014 1:46 am
- Collector: Yes
- Player: Yes
- Decks Owned: 400
- Location: Wisconsin
- Has thanked: 420 times
- Been thanked: 440 times
- Contact:
Re: User defined values
Correction. As pointed out in another related thread, having a set of custom text fields would be greatly useful. I think we could get by with free text (vs keywords to also manage), although that would be cool to have individual customization categories to manage within an individual collection. Just adding the 3-5 custom text fields would allow people to create values for things like Type (Souvenir, Advertising, Repro, Novelty) or Specialty (Flourishing, Magic, Art, Fanning) which will be especially useful if these are not handled at the database level. Although there certainly could be any number of attributes somebody may want to apply to decks and then later be able to group based on it that doesn't work easily with checkboxes or numeric fields.ecNate wrote:I think 3-5 custom fields for each check boxes and numeric might be a better goal though. We already have a description field so I don't think any custom sub labels (text boxes) would be needed here.
My card collection ('in hand' only) on Portfolio52 (the playing card database)
My wishlist, contact me if you have one to sell, let's chat! (My marketplace review thread)
My card collection thread here at UC
♠️ ♦️ My currently featured deck from my collection at Portfolio 52: Vanity Fair No 41 ♥️ ♣️
As a UC member you are encouraged to contribute/join Portfolio52, the greatest card collection site (FacebookPage)!
My wishlist, contact me if you have one to sell, let's chat! (My marketplace review thread)
My card collection thread here at UC
♠️ ♦️ My currently featured deck from my collection at Portfolio 52: Vanity Fair No 41 ♥️ ♣️
As a UC member you are encouraged to contribute/join Portfolio52, the greatest card collection site (FacebookPage)!
- montecarlojoe
- Moderator
- Posts: 2529
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 7:10 am
- Collector: Yes
- Player: Yes
- White Whale: Avant Guard UL Gr - No17 Crown
- Decks Owned: 690
- Location: Portsmouth, England
- Has thanked: 253 times
- Been thanked: 268 times
- Contact:
Re: User defined values
I agree - for those things we weill never care about stats for - personal notes, condition etc a couple of text fields for each deck would be cool
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests